REPORT FORM
1. English and Scientific names: Western Tanager Piranga ludoviciana |
2. Number of individuals, sexes, ages, general plumage
(e.g., 2 in alternate plumage): |
1
adult/1st year male |
3. Locality: Parish:
____________Lafayette_____________________________ |
Specific
Locality: ___________Near |
4. Date(s) when observed:
Dec 30, 2011 |
|
5. Time(s) of day when observed: 1130am |
|
6. Reporting observer and address: Toddy Guidry, Lafayette 70508 |
|
7. Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified
the bird(s): |
Erik
Johnson, Mark Broussard |
8. Other observers who independently identified the
bird(s): |
|
9. Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade
and to direction and amount of light): |
cloudy, low light. Bird presented broadside and straight
forward views, see photos |
10. Optical equipment (type, power, condition): |
Nikon
D5000, Nikon 300mm lens |
11. Distance to bird(s):
30 ft |
|
12. Duration of observation: 2 minutes |
|
13. Habitat: brushy
woodlot in ag field |
|
14. Behavior of bird / circumstances of observation
(flying, feeding, resting; include and stress habits used in identification;
relate events surrounding observation): |
bird
came to screech owl call, agitated, eventually flew off |
15. Description (include only what was actually seen, not
what "should" have been seen; include if possible: total
length/relative size compared to other familiar species, body bulk, shape,
proportions, bill, eye, leg, and plumage
characteristics. Stress features that separate it from similar species): |
see
photo |
16. Voice: did not
hear vocalization |
|
17. Similar species (include how they were eliminated by
your observation): |
female SCTA, imm SUTA. Black wings with yellow/white wingbars, red in face |
18. Photographs or tape recordings obtained? (by whom? attached?): |
photos taken by Toddy Guidry, attached. |
19. Previous experience with this species: 1st
observation |
|
20. Identification aids: (list books, illustrations, other
birders, etc. used in identification): |
|
a. at time of observation: suspected it was WETA based on guide books
illustrations etc. Confirmed ID by Erik Johnson observation |
|
b. after observation: Sibley Guide to Birds for age, sex |
|
21. This description is written from: _____ notes made
during the observation (_____notes attached?);_____notes
made after the observation (date:_____); __X__memory. |
22. Are you positive of your identification if not,
explain: yes |
|
23. Date:_12-31-11______Time:___245pm____ |
|