English and Scientific names: |
Tundra Swan (Cygnus columbianus)
|
Number of individuals: |
(1 adult and 1
juvenile) |
Locality: |
East Carroll |
Specific Locality: |
jct. of |
Date(s) when observed: |
25 January 2009 |
Time(s) of day when observed: |
8:50-9:00 AM CST |
Reporting observer and address: |
Justin Bosler |
Other observers
accompanying reporter who also identified the bird(s): |
Devin Bosler |
Other observers who
independently identified the bird(s) |
None |
Light conditions
(position of bird in relation to shade and to direction and amount of light): |
Fairly bright,
overcast skies with low ceiling. No
backlighting or glare to impede viewing conditions. |
Optical equipment: |
Zeiss Victory FL
8x42 binocular (good) and Kowa Prominar
TSN-4 77mm spotting scope w/ 20-60x zoom eyepiece (good). |
Distance to bird(s): |
|
Duration of observation: |
approx. 2-3
minutes |
Habitat: |
Semi-wooded |
Behavior of bird: |
Both swans were
observed flying in tandem at low altitude from S to N along the levee and
over |
Description: |
Two large, white
to whitish swans that appeared relatively short-necked and long-tailed. Adult-plumaged
swan had an entirely black bill, however, the lores
were not seen well enough to assess coloration. The bill did not appear oversized in relation
to the head. The
forehead was rounded and
sloped sharply at the base of the bill.
The neck appeared pinched-in toward the head and was held parallel to
the body. First-cycle swan was largely white below with a smudgy, pale gray
or brown cast to upperparts. Head,
neck, upper back, and upperwing coverts retaining
pale brownish/grayish juvenal plumage, but most noticeably on the head and
neck, which were more dingy gray. The
bill was dusky-pink throughout. The
flight style was almost goose-like with steady and graceful, less laborious, wingbeats. Also,
neither swan was marked with a neck collar or wing tag. |
Voice: |
Silent. |
Similar species: |
Mute Swan (MUSW)
was easily eliminated by head shape, bill shape, and lack
of any orange on the bill (pertaining to adult), in addition to slimmer size, narrower
wings, longer tail, etc. Immature MUSW
can be eliminated by the predominantly whitish plumage and paler (dusky-pink)
bill base. Trumpeter Swan (TRUS) can be eliminated by
slimmer structure of body and wings, relatively short and tapered neck,
longish tail, rounded, sloping head, bill with concave sides, and dark eyes
appearing isolated on face. In flight, neck appeared thinner and narrowed at
the head, unlike TRUS. Flight style was more fluid than seen in TRUS with
snappier wing beats. Unfortunately voice could not be used to further
eliminate TRUS. Advanced stage of molt of immature perhaps
of greatest significance in eliminating TRUS. Considering cygnets stay with
their parent(s) through their first year supports the fact that the immature
swan is less than a year old and in its first molt-cycle. The molt timing of
immature TUSW is significantly different from TRUS in that it occurs within a
much shorter period of time. That said, one can
safely eliminate immature TRUS in mid-winter by carefully noting plumage
aspect. A mostly white body (especially back and rump) and remiges in Jan is essentially diagnostic for TUSW in
their first winter, whereas TRUS would be largely gray-brown throughout,
including back and rump, with only scattered white feathers. |
Photographs or tape
recordings obtained? |
No photos
obtained. |
Previous experience with
this species: |
Rather extensive
field experience with Tundra Swan in the mid-Atlantic states fall through
spring. Somewhat limited experience with Trumpeter Swan from MN, NY, and PA,
with those few encounters involving individuals or small family groups, and
not in direct comparison with Tundra. |
Identification aids: |
after observation: Frontiers
of Bird ID listserv discussion |
This description is written from: |
notes made during observation and memory. |
Are you positive of your
identification? If not, explain: |
Yes, 100%
positive. |
Date and time: |
11 March 2009 11:30 PM |