LOUISIANA BIRD RECORDS COMMITTEE

REPORT FORM

     This form is intended as a convenience in reporting observations of species on the Louisiana Bird Records Committee (LBRC) Review List. The LBRC recommends the use of this form or a similar format when submitting records for review (to assure that all pertinent information is accounted for). Attach additional pages as necessary. Please print or type. Attach xerox of field notes, drawings, photographs, or tape recordings, if available. Include all photos for more obscurely marked species. When completed, mail to Secretary, Louisiana Bird Records Committee, c/o Museum of Natural Science, 119 Foster Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-3216.

1. English and Scientific names:  Tropical Kingbird (Tyrannus melancholicus)

2. Number of individuals, sexes, ages, general plumage (e.g., 2 in alternate plumage):

3 adult birds were observed chasing one another in between sallying bouts

 

3. Locality: LOUISIANA: (parish) St. Bernard

 

Specific Locality: East Park Blvd near Caernarvon Diversion Canal, Braithwaite, LA

4. Date(s) when observed:  March 13, 2011

5. Time(s) of day when observed:  12:30 – 1:00 PM

6. Reporting observer and address: 1967 Tulip Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70806

7. Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified the bird(s):  Jacob Cooper, Kevin Morgan, Morgan Tingley (and his friend Phil)

8. Other observers who independently identified the bird(s):  Justin and Devin Bosler, Phillip Wallace, Ryan Terrill, and many others

9. Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade and to direction and amount of light):  perfect sunny day

10. Optical equipment (type, power, condition):  10 x 50 Alpen binocular; also had Alpen spotting scope

11. Distance to bird(s):  They stayed away from us in the trees on the levee, about 60 yards away.

12. Duration of observation:  We watched them the for the full 30 minutes.

13. Habitat:  edge of a suburban neighborhood that borders a levee of the diversion canal.

14. Behavior of bird / circumstances of observation (flying, feeding, resting; include and stress habits used in identification; relate events surrounding observation):  During this second visit the birds were seen mostly perched high in trees behind the levee.  When we first found them, 2 birds were perched in the same tree.  One of them was singing, while the other quietly sat.  As we continued watching, Jacob heard a second song coming from our far left.  I agreed with the conclusion that the song was another Tropical Kingbird, and as I turned to see the third bird, it flew and perched in a tree within 15 feet of the other two birds.  We were able to view all three birds in the spotting scope at the same time.  We all concurred that they were all Topical Kingbirds.  Two of them sang or called repeatedly.

15. Description (include only what was actually seen, not what "should" have been seen; include if possible: total length/relative size compared to other familiar species, body bulk, shape, proportions, bill, eye, leg, and plumage characteristics. Stress features that separate it from similar species):  All birds had bright yellow bellies and breasts, with a darker brownish green back.  The tail color was similar to the back and not black as expected in the Western Kingbird.  We noticed a notched appearance to the tail on 1-2 of the birds. The bill was long and stout and black.

16. Voice:  These birds did vocalize to give calls and partial songs; this allowed elimination of Couch’s Kingbird.

17. Similar species (include how they were eliminated by your observation):  Western Kingbird; Couch’s Kingbird (already described how each was eliminated)

18. Photographs or tape recordings obtained? (by whom? attached?):  no photos or pictures on this trip; the birds stayed too far for satisfying shots.

19. Previous experience with this species:  I have seen this species and Couch’s Kingbird on several occasions in the Rio Grande Valley.  Jacob and Morgan had seen these birds many times in tropical South America or Mexico.

20. Identification aids: (list books, illustrations, other birders, etc. used in identification):

a. at time of observation:  none

b. after observation:  none

21. This description is written from: _____ notes made during the observation (_____notes attached?);_____notes made after the observation (date:_____); __X__memory.

22. Are you positive of your identification if not, explain:  yes; because the vocalizations were dead-on for Tropical Kingbird; also, many other birders had already ID them

23. Signature of reporter: Jeffrey W. Harris   Date:  March 19, 2011   Time:  10:25 AM

24. May the LBRC have permission to display this report or
portions of this report on its webite?   yes

If yes, may we include your name with the report? yes

Return to LBRC Page