English and Scientific names: |
Ruff (Philomachus pugnax)
|
Number of individuals: |
1
male in basic plumage |
Locality: |
Jeff Davis Parish |
Specific Locality: |
About ½ mile S of junction of Hwy 3056 and Hwy 14, on the W side
of Hwy 3056 |
Date(s) when observed: |
02/20/2010 |
Time(s) of day when observed: |
Early
afternoon, 2:30 or so. |
Reporting observer and address: |
Paul Conover |
Other observers
accompanying reporter who also identified the bird(s): |
Donna Dittmann, Steve Cardiff |
Other observers who
independently identified the bird(s) |
The bird is still being seen as of the writing of this report.
Mac Myers, Erik Johnson, James Beck, et al observed it the next day, Jeff
Harris reported it today, and others reported it in the interim. |
Light conditions
(position of bird in relation to shade and to direction and amount of light): |
Sunny, bird to W and sun basically overhead with the slight
southern orientation of late February. |
Optical equipment: |
Zeiss 10s, Nikon Fieldscope III ED with 20-60X eyepiece and
various camcorder and Nikon D50 connections.
|
Distance to bird(s): |
Initially about 50 yards, then perhaps 100 yards, out to many hundreds of yards. |
Duration of observation: |
I watched it for perhaps an hour in all. |
Habitat: |
A complex of flooded ag fields on |
Behavior of bird: |
Bird was first seen as it preened in a flock of dowitchers, both
yellowlegs, Dunlin, and Stilt Sandpiper. I saw a bird facing me with brightish white underparts and slight dusky scalloping on
the breast but with its head hidden as it preened. I was pretty sure it would
prove to be a Ruff so I grabbed a scope and waited for its head to emerge. When
it raised its head and confirmed my ID I grabbed a camera (with a short lens)
in hopes of getting a recognizable image. I snapped twice, then something
flushed the flock and it scattered. I called Steve and informed him I’d lost
a Ruff and might need assistance relocating it. Luckily, within a few minutes
the flock shifted again and I spotted the bird and got documentation. As we
watched the bird over the course of perhaps an hour, it foraged in the water
by picking below the surface, it preened, and it flew with the flock a couple
of times. |
Description: |
A
medium-sized shorebird, comparable to Greater Yellowlegs. Stocky and
thick-necked, hump-backed like surrounding dowitchers, very broad dorso-laterally. Looked relatively small-headed because
of its thick neck. Overall
the bird’s colors seemed fairly equally split between gray/grayish-brown
(above) and whitish (below). Head:
The dividing line between the two basic colors was fairly distinct on the
head and neck, with the flat pale gray on crown and auriculars and running
back along nape contrasting fairly sharply with the white chin and throat,
and dusky whitish upper breast. The general impression the coloration and
pattern of the head and neck gave me was similar to a basic plumage Wilson’s
Phalarope. Just my impression. There may have been a pale area on the lores,
but I didn’t note pale feathering at the upper bill base. Body
upperparts: The mantle of the bird was similar in gray to the nape, with a
scattering of small dark markings very sparsely mixed in. The
scapulars and coverts were medium gray, perhaps with slightly duskier internal
markings on some of these feathers, and fringed broadly with what appeared to
be a paler gray, perhaps brownish or grayish-brown. The back appeared scaled. Rump
and upperparts of tail not seen well.
Underparts:
Chin and throat seemed clean white, breast cloudy pale gray with speckling or
scalloping of darker markings. Flanks, belly, and vent white. Flanks with
pattern of scattered dusky markings. Underwings
clean white with dusky patagium and dusky trailing edge. Bill
about the length of head or longer, stout at base, narrowing toward tip. The
bill was curved along its length, not strongly but distinctly, in the way
that, say, a Least Sandpiper’s bill is. Bill appeared
all dark to me in the field, but some photos suggest a bit of orange at the
base, perhaps just on base of mandible. Legs
orange or yellow-orange, bright. Eyes
appeared dark. |
Voice: |
Not
noted |
Similar species: |
Often cited as similar to Greater Yellowlegs, but clearly differs
from Greater Yellowlegs in mantle pattern and in thicker-necked morphology. No
other close matches among shorebirds the size and basic structure of this
male bird. |
Photographs or tape
recordings obtained? |
Photos
and video. |
Previous experience with
this species: |
Probably
a half-dozen other encounters with Ruffs, half of which I have good videotape
of. Most of the Ruffs I’ve seen have differed in appearance. This individual
is probably most similar to a bird Donna Dittmann and Steve Cardiff found on
Hwy 35 in 1994. |
Identification aids: |
|
This description is written from: |
Memory, photos. |
Are you positive of your
identification? If not, explain: |
Yes |
Reporter: |
Paul
Conover
|
Date and time: |
02/24/2010, 9:40 PM |