REPORT FORM
1. English and Scientific names: Lesser
Nighthawk, Chordeiles acutipennis |
2. Number of individuals, sexes, ages, general plumage
(e.g., 2 in alternate plumage): 1 male, plus 1
unknown |
3. Parish: Cameron |
Specific Locality: Peveto Woods |
4. Date(s) when observed: 05/11/2012 |
5. Time(s) of day when observed: mid-afternoon,
then again at dusk |
6. Reporting observer and address: Paul Conover, Lafayette, LA |
|
7. Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified
the bird(s): David Muth |
|
8. Other observers who independently identified the
bird(s): I
don’t know who else got good looks at it.
|
|
9. Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade
and to direction and amount of light): Shade, but
well lit. |
10. Optical equipment (type, power, condition): Zeiss 10s, Nikon D50 w/300 mm lens.
|
11. Distance to bird(s):
I walked to within about 30 yards before
the bird flushed. |
|
12. Duration of observation: perhaps 2 minutes |
13. Habitat: Remnant chenier
woods adjacent to coast |
|
14. Behavior of bird / circumstances of observation: David Muth and I were in the
open parking lot area of the BRAS Peveto Sanctuary when a nighthawk flew in
below the levels of the trees and began casting about for a landing spot. It settled on a live oak branch. We both suspected it was a
Lesser when we first saw it. I noticed
its small size and somewhat falcon-like shape, gliding flight style beneath
the canopy, and the fact that it was a very buffy male with paler brownish
primaries than the Commons present. We took some photos of the
bird perched, then I walked up on it and managed to
get one flight shot. The bird went
into the woods and I didn’t see it again, although I believe David and maybe
some of the others with us did as well.
In the evening, when light was
still in the sky, I watched 2 nighthawks that had similar shape, size, flight
style take off and make a few drifting circles above treetop level before
drifting away. They were flying
together, but not in the choreographed flight the pairs and trios of Common
Nighthawks were engaging in. Photos of
one, included, show white bar very close to primary tip. 15. Description: Very
buffy and brown nightjar with white bars across primaries and narrow white subterminal
tail band. The bird was alert and had its
head raised.
Overall size seemed somewhat small (but we had seen some pretty small
female Commons that day that seemed in the same size range). Most noticeable visible marks were the
white throat patch, and two rows of pale spots, one which was half of a pair
that formed a sort of broad incomplete mantle V (I only saw one side, but I’m
assuming the markings were symmetrical), and the other row formed by pale tips
of lesser or median coverts. This
covert row ran as a short pale horizontal line back from the bend of the wing. Primaries appeared slightly blunt-ended, and
a worn brown color, not dark gray or blackish. Visible underparts of perched bird with
buffy ground color and narrow dark brown barring. Flight photo shows solidly
buffy ground color to underparts, including undertail coverts. Tail transversely barred buff
and dark brown, bars distinct, buffy bars thicker. This pattern continued to tail tip, except
last pale bar slightly thicker and white instead of buff. Terminal band of tail dark brown. Spread wings with somewhat
short arm, outer primary tips spaced like spread fingers
at least some of time in flight. White
bar on primaries apparently confined to 4 outer primaries, narrowing in rear,
positioned on the primaries distally at about the tip of p6. Inner primaries and the secondaries mottled
with buff spotting but pattern not detectable. Underwing coverts buffy barred narrowly
with dark brown. |
|
16. Voice: none
heard |
|
17. Similar species (include how they were eliminated by
your observation): Buff spotting on inner primaries indicates Lesser. I expect male Commons to have brightish white ground color to undertail coverts. Wing
shape with short arm and no clear-cut bend in hind-wing better for Lesser. White wingbar on primaries of Commons
starts at the tip of the greater primary coverts; on this bird, bar began far
distal to that. Extent and shape of
wingbar seem better for Lesser. |
|
18. Photographs or tape recordings obtained? (by whom? attached?): yes, by
me and David Muth. |
|
19. Previous experience with this species: Pretty wide, as
vagrants in state and in their typical range.
|
|
20. Identification aids: (list books, illustrations, other
birders, etc. used in identification): |
|
a. at time of observation: |
|
b. after observation: |
|
21. This description is written from: memory and photo review. |
22. Are you positive of your identification if not,
explain: yes |
|
23. Date: 5/15/2013 |
|