REPORT FORM
1. English and Scientific names: Iceland Gull (Larus
glaucoides kumlieni) |
2. Number of individuals, sexes, ages, general plumage
(e.g., 2 in alternate plumage): 1 first or possibly second cycle |
|
3. Locality: Parish: Plaquemines Parish |
Specific
Locality: Venice Dump |
4. Date(s) when observed: 30 March 2013 |
|
5. Time(s) of day when observed: 9:44-10:14am |
|
6. Reporting observer and address: Phillip Wallace
New Orleans, LA 70125 |
|
7. Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified
the bird(s): David Muth, Dan Purrington |
|
8. Other observers who independently identified the
bird(s): Reported by Tom Johnson on 9 March; seen subsequently by many others
|
|
9. Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade
and to direction and amount of light): Good; light perpendicular to line of
sight. |
|
10. Optical equipment (type, power, condition): Kowa 22x60
scope |
|
11. Distance to bird(s):20-100 m |
|
12. Duration of observation: 20 minutes |
|
13. Habitat: Industrial yard near dump. |
|
14. Behavior of bird / circumstances of observation
(flying, feeding, resting; include and stress habits used in identification;
relate events surrounding observation): Resting, preening, flying. |
|
15. Description (include only what was actually seen, not
what "should" have been seen; include if possible: total
length/relative size compared to other familiar species, body bulk, shape,
proportions, bill, eye, leg, and plumage characteristics. Stress features that
separate it from similar species): Essentially a white plumaged gull smaller
than a Herring but larger than RB Gull; small, rounded head shape; pinkish or
horn-colored bill with black distal third lacking sharp demarcation, bill
relatively short and small; very pale gray mantle; some pale coffee color in
underwing linings; pink legs; primaries white; tail white distally with some
pale coffee coloration basally; dirty coffee color on the belly; |
|
16. Voice: None |
|
17. Similar species (include how they were eliminated by
your observation): Thayer’s is primary contender, with taxonomy unclear.
Kumlien’s paler and more petite; out of range birds difficult to ID with
certainty. Smaller and more petite than Glaucous; bill smaller. |
|
18. Photographs or tape recordings obtained? (by whom?
attached?): Photos by Wallace at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5hrfpqjlmhep182/lAs9NHYjyJ
|
|
19. Previous experience with this species: One possible
sighting at Rutherford Beach several years ago still under review. |
|
20. Identification aids: (list books, illustrations, other
birders, etc. used in identification): |
|
a. at time of observation: None |
|
b. after observation: Howell and Dunn |
|
21. This description is written from: Notes, memory, and photos. |
22. Are you positive of your identification if not, explain:
No, but primarily because of taxonomic issues. |
|
23. Date: 20 May 2013 Time: 9:15 pm |
|
|