English and Scientific names: |
Common Merganser (Mergus merganser) |
Number of individuals: |
1 adult female in breeding plumage. |
Locality: LOUISIANA: |
Terrebonne |
Specific Locality: |
Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, 8124 Highway 56,
Cocodrie |
Date(s) when observed: |
Feb. 10, 2009 |
Time(s) of day when
observed: |
14:30 to 15:00 hours. |
Reporting observer and address: |
Russell Martin, Jr., Chauvin, LA. |
Other observers accompanying reporter who
also identified the bird(s): |
John Conover |
Light conditions: |
Full sunlight. Bird was at 90% angle to sunlight (bird
S.E., afternoon sun S.W.) compared to vantage point where observers were
stationed. Observers were approximately 7 feet off the ground, viewing from a
cement ramp behind the facility--bird was below line of sight, swimming in
area with reflected sky light and reflected dark background of bulkhead along
side of boat landing area behind bird. Distinguishing characteristics of bird
were seen with both light and dark “backdrop” of reflected water. |
Optical
equipment: |
Zeiss 10X40B in excellent condition (6 years old) |
Distance to
bird(s): |
50 yards to 200 yards. |
Duration of
observation: |
20 minutes. Bird was observed by other staff most of day. |
Habitat: |
brackish/salt water “lagoon” enclosed by bulkheads and
rock levees, surrounded by salt marsh habitat approx. 1 mile north of
Terrebonne Bay. |
Behavior of bird:
|
Bird swam most of time it was seen. It was observed
by J.C. flying away from observer in late afternoon. At one time of
day, it was observed near a lone Double-crested Cormorant. Workers noticed
the bird swimming and probably feeding close to shore at boat launch.
It would swim towards center of “lagoon” as people walked nearby. |
Description:
|
To the naked eye, bird appeared to be a common loon in
general size and profile. Upon looking through binoculars, however, it
was clearly a merganser species. Bird was initially observed swimming
near a Double-crested cormorant, and was roughly a similar-sized bird; not
noticeably smaller in size compared with cormorant, as would a Red-breasted
Merganser. Distance of bird to observers was never more than 200 yards,
and usually no more distant than 100 yards. Bird swam with head upright for
entire period that it was photographed. Large, wedge-shaped head apparent in
profile, with a single crest of feathers at back of head. Bird was wide, in
relation to size, much like a Canvasback, and very stocky in overall build.
Beak of bird was much thicker than Red-breasted Merganser. Sides and
back of bird were a dull gray. Bird had a clearly distinguished white
patch on its chin. Chin patch ended abruptly above throat. Throat was
rich rusty color, as was neck and head of the bird; coloration much more
distinct than Red-breasted Merganser. A clearly defined thick white
area was observed on lower half of throat. This marking wrapped completely
around to lower back of neck (where it meets mantle). White appeared to
abruptly end on sides of bird, almost as uniformly as it did on neck where it
bordered rich brown color of throat. Tail of bird was slightly above
water line, parallel to surface. White wing patch barely observable on bird
as it swam. In flight, large white wing patches were observed. Wing
patch was split by a very subtle, thin (gray) line separating greater coverts
and secondaries; not a bold dark separation as seen in Red-breasted
Mergansers. A close-up of photos taken shows distinctive facial features,
including bill thickness at base of bill as bird looked at observers.
Eye of bird is brown, not red. Tail length of bird is easily seen, longer
than one would expect to see in Red-breasted Merganser. |
Voice: |
None heard. |
Similar
species: |
All other N. American Mergansers eliminated by size and
diagnostic features (both shape and proportion of bird, head/neck coloration,
white patterns on chin and lower neck, and bill shape/size). No other
duck species share a combination of these elements that would confuse
observers. |
Photographs
or tape recordings obtained? |
Yes. Photographs were taken by J.C. and cropped close ups
(with no color/contrast enhancement) are attached to this report.
Original images (app. 3 megs each) available upon request. |
Previous experience with this species: |
Observer R.M. has extensive experience with the bird,
having carved both sexes of the species and entered in international
competition, based on in-hand frozen specimens. Observer J.C. has
minimal experience with species, having seen a flock in northern Michigan. |
Identification
aids: at time of
observation: |
None used. |
after
observation: |
Sibley Guide to Birds, Google Image Search (for
comparisons with immature/female Red-breasted Merganser). |
Notes made
from? |
Description written from memory and comparison between
R.M. and J.C. of their impressions of physical characteristics of bird |
Are you
positive of your identification? If not, explain: |
Yes |
Reporter: |
Russell Martin, Jr. |
Date and
time: |
2/11/2009 (submitted by J.C. 2/18/09). |