LOUISIANA BIRD RECORDS COMMITTEE
REPORT FORM
This form is intended as a convenience in reporting observations of species on the Louisiana Bird Records Committee (LBRC) Review List. The LBRC recommends the use of this form or a similar format when submitting records for review (to assure that all pertinent information is accounted for). Attach additional pages as necessary. Please print or type. Attach xerox of field notes, drawings, photographs, or tape recordings, if available. Include all photos for more obscurely marked species. When completed, mail to Secretary, Louisiana Bird Records Committee, c/o Museum of Natural Science, 119 Foster Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-3216.
1. English and Scientific names: Common Merganser, Mergus merganser |
2. Number of individuals, sexes, ages, general plumage (e.g., 2 in alternate plumage): |
3 females in basic plumage |
3. Locality: Parish: Union Parish. |
Specific Locality: Bayou D’Arbonne Lake spillway |
4. Date(s) when observed: December 14, 2013 |
|
5. Time(s) of day when observed: 4:30 pm |
|
6. Reporting observer and address: John Dillon, 183 Dance Road, Athens, LA |
|
7. Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified the bird(s): Gerry Click. |
|
8. Other observers who independently identified the bird(s): Devin Bosler, Steve Pagans. |
|
9. Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade and to direction and amount of light): Poor light. Overcast with haze on lake. |
|
10. Optical equipment (type, power, condition): Alpen 8x42 bins in good condition; Alpen 20-60X scope in good condition. |
|
11. Distance to bird(s): 70-80 yards. |
|
12. Duration of observation: 10-15 minutes. |
|
13. Habitat: open water. |
|
14. Behavior of bird / circumstances of observation (flying, feeding, resting; include and stress habits used in identification; relate events surrounding observation): swimming slowly; never dove or preened. |
|
15. Description (include
only what was actually seen, not what "should" have been seen; include
if possible: total length/relative size compared to other familiar species,
body bulk, shape, proportions, bill, eye, leg, and
plumage characteristics. Stress features that separate it from similar
species): When we got out of the
vehicle, I immediately saw the birds and mis-identified
them as Red-breasted Mergansers. I had
never seen female COME before, and RBME is far more likely. Neither Gerry nor I ever seriously
considered COME until I saw a few days later that Devin Bosler
had photographed 2 COME in the same place.
After looking at Steve Pagans’ photos of the same 3 birds I photographed, I
realized that the birds in my photos were COME, RBME. Large merganser with long
bill but not too thin. Wispy, droopy
crest and dark head coloration. Upper
side of body completely gray with white wing patch clearly visible. Could not see white chin patch or wide bill
base at the time of observation. Both
are visible in the photos under high magnification and contrast
manipulation. Sharp demarcation
between head color and breast/back color.
|
|
16. Voice: N/A. |
|
17. Similar species (include
how they were eliminated by your observation): Female Red-breasted Merganser would have
smaller base to bill and would not show such a sharp demarcation between head
coloration and breast/back coloration.
No other species would be easily confused. |
|
18. Photographs or tape recordings obtained? (by whom? attached?): Yes, attached in email. |
|
19. Previous experience with this species: Never with female. |
|
20. Identification aids: (list books, illustrations, other birders, etc. used in identification): |
|
a. at time of observation: Nat Geo 6th ed. and Sibley. |
|
b. after observation: Nat Geo 6th ed., Sibley, Peterson, Van Remsen, Terry Davis, photos by Steve Pagans of same birds. |
|
21. This description is written from: _____ notes made during the observation (_____notes attached?);_____notes made after the observation (date:_____); __X___memory. |
22. Are you positive of your identification if not, explain: Yes. |
|
23. Date: December 31, 2013. Time: 1:55 pm. |
|
24. May the LBRC have
permission to display this report or |
If yes, may we include your name with the report? Yes. |
|