REPORT FORM
1. English and Scientific names: Chestnut-collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus) |
2. Number of individuals, sexes, ages, general plumage
(e.g., 2 in alternate plumage): two in
basic plumage |
|
3. Locality: Parish:
Caddo___________________________________________ |
Specific
Locality: Shreveport airport____________________________________ |
4. Date(s) when observed: January 26, 2013 |
|
5. Time(s) of day when observed: approximately 13:55 (we
started walking at 13:40) |
|
6. Reporting observer and address: Jim Holmes Sacramento, CA
95817 |
|
7. Other observers accompanying reporter who also identified
the bird(s): Terry Davis, others
on the LOS Winter meeting trip to the airport |
|
8. Other observers who independently identified the
bird(s): initially identified by Terry
Davis |
|
9. Light conditions (position of bird in relation to shade
and to direction and amount of light): overcast |
|
10. Optical equipment (type, power, condition): Swarvoski EL 42 (new) |
|
11. Distance to bird(s): as close as 25 feet when flushed |
|
12. Duration of observation: birds flushed on several occasions and watched at leisure as they
circled around in flight. |
|
13. Habitat: Shreveport
airport with short grasses and bare ground.
I believe the grasses are Aristida grasses. |
|
14. Behavior of bird / circumstances of observation
(flying, feeding, resting; include and stress habits
used in identification; relate events surrounding observation): Birds were flushed from the ground. They both called as they flew up. Initially, one single bird was flushed and
was watched in flight. After being flushed, it joined the flock of Smith’s
Longspurs that were circling us. They
all landed ~100 yards from us. We
walked that way and when flushing the Smith’s Longspurs again, we flushed two
Chestnut-collard Longspurs (the initial and a 2nd bird). All the longspurs landed in the grass and
we flushed them again with similar results (called as they flushed and then
flew around with the Smith’s). |
|
15. Description (include only what was actually seen, not
what "should" have been seen; include if possible: total
length/relative size compared to other familiar species, body bulk, shape,
proportions, bill, eye, leg, and plumage
characteristics. Stress features that separate it from similar species): A small brown passerine flushed from the
ground. It was dull brown. In flight with the Smith’s Longspurs, it
was slightly smaller but the size difference was clearly apparent. I was unable to appreciate any difference
in white in the tail between the Chestnut-collared and Smith’s Longspurs. Both birds appeared to be winter plumage
females (no dark on chest or chestnut collar noted). Birds were not seen well enough on the
ground to identify. |
|
16. Voice: Both
birds called several times when flushed.
The call was two syllable “kit-tal” given
3-4 times as it flushed. At the time we
first flushed the initial chestnut-collared longspur, I said, “that is a
different longspur, get on it.” I
immediately realized it was not Smith’s (which we had already flushed and
heard) or Lapland (which I am more familiar with). At the same time, Terry Davis called it a “Chestnut-collared”. The bird flew up in the air and joined the
Smith’s. I immediately played a
recording of both Chestnut-collared and McCown’s Longspurs (from www.allaboutbirds.org). The Chestnut-collared Longspur call on this
website matched the call of the longspur we flushed. Shortly after this we flushed a second bird
that gave a similar call (kit-tal),
and it too joined the Smith’s in flight.
|
|
17. Similar species (include how they were eliminated by your observation): Other species of
longspurs were ruled out by voice. In
addition, direct comparison in flight revealed the Chestnut-collared to be
smaller and perhaps plainer than the Smith’s.
I was unable to appreciate any differences in white in the tail
between the two species. |
|
18. Photographs or tape recordings obtained? (by whom? attached?): Tape
recordings of both the Chestnut-collared and Smith’s longspurs were obtained
by Terry Davis. I have a copy if needed. |
|
19. Previous experience with this species: I have seen this species on multiple
occasions in California, Nevada, Arizona and on its
breeding grounds in Colorado. I was
not, however, familiar enough with the call to know what it was without
hearing a recording of its call immediately after. |
|
20. Identification aids: (list books, illustrations, other
birders, etc. used in identification): |
|
a. at time of observation: www.allaboutbirds.org
website was used to listen to the call immediately after. This website has several recordings of
Chestnut-collared Longspur song and one recording of its call. I listened to
the recording of its call. |
|
b. after observation: |
|
21. This description is written from: _____ notes made
during the observation (_____notes attached?);___X__notes
made after the observation (date:_Jan.
26, 2013); _____memory. |
22. Are you positive of your identification if not,
explain: yes |
|
23. Date:_February 16, 2013_________Time:10:30am (Pacific) |
|